Skip Navigation
Explore our COVID-19 Resources and Updates
CHS blue logo square
 
 
Home > Our Work > All Publications > 2005

Publications

Our publications keep professionals working across the public, private, and academic sectors informed on the most important developments and issues in health security and biosecurity.

Find an article or report by keywords:

 
 
Find an article or report or see all by area, author, or year:

Title:

National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza and the HHS Pandemic Influenza Plan: Thoughts and Comments

Authors:
Staff of the Center for Biosecurity of UPMC
Date posted:
December 15, 2005
Publication type:
Commentary
Publication:

Biosecur Bioterror 2005;3(4):292-294

Publisher:
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Availability:
Available on publisher's website
See also:

Full article as PDF

Introduction:

On November 1 and 2, 2005, the Bush Administration released two documents that describe what the federal government—and everyone else—should do to prepare and respond to a flu pandemic. National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza is a clear, 12-page overview of the conceptual categories or “pillars” that frame the government’s approach: “preparedness and communication,” “surveillance and detection,” and “response and containment.” The content of this document largely mirrors the speech given by President Bush at the NIH on November 1.

The second document, the long-awaited, 200-plus-page HHS Pandemic Influenza Plan (the “Plan”) was released by Secretary Leavitt the next day. It was expected to describe the priorities, roles and responsibilities, and operational details of the actual implementation of the national strategy in states, cities, towns, and hospitals across the nation. Unfortunately, the Plan does not meet those expectations.

Without question, the Plan is a significant document. It presents some of the federal government’s assumptions and provides detailed lists describing what should happen on the state or local levels and what could be done in areas such as “community disease control and prevention.” In truth, though, the federal “plan” is more reference document than plan, with its comprehensive checklist of the considerations, actions, authorities, and problems that might confront states, localities, hospitals, businesses, and citizens as they prepare for or deal with a flu pandemic.

Puzzlingly, some of the priorities emphasized by the President, such as “a crash program” to create large supplies of pandemic flu vaccine using cell culture technology, are given scant attention in the HHS plan. And key elements of the U.S. strategy that were announced by the President are not supported adequately. For example, efforts “to control and monitor flu in Asia” are allotted only $251 million—about equal to the cost of building a single bridge in Alaska.

 

 

Our Mission

To protect people’s health from epidemics and disasters and ensure that communities are resilient to major challenges.