Skip Navigation
Explore our COVID-19 Resources and Updates
CHS blue logo square
 
 
Home > Our Work > All Publications > 2004

Publications

Our publications keep professionals working across the public, private, and academic sectors informed on the most important developments and issues in health security and biosecurity.

Find an article or report by keywords:

 
 
Find an article or report or see all by area, author, or year:

Title:

Taking the Measure of Countermeasures: Leaders’ Views on the Nation’s Capacity to Develop Biodefense Countermeasures

Authors:
Lynne Gilfillan, Bradley T. Smith, Thomas V. Inglesby, Krishna Kodukula, Ari Schuler, Mark Lister, Tara O’Toole
Date posted:
December 15, 2004
Publication type:
Article
Publication:

Biosecur Bioterror 2004;2(4):320-327

Publisher:
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Availability:
Available on publisher's website
See also:

Full article as PDF

Introduction:

The purpose of this study was to gather and analyze the views of leaders from academia, government, and industry regarding the capacity of the U.S. to develop biodefense countermeasures and to elicit their recommendations on steps that would improve the nation’s capacities to succeed in these efforts.

The anthrax attacks of 2001 hinted at the kind of illness and civil disruption a few letters laden with Bacillus anthracisspores could cause. The attacks also began to illustrate the grave impact that larger, more sophisticated bioattacks could have on the country. In the years since the attacks, the federal government has spent more than $14 billion on civilian biodefense, approximately $5 billion of which has been allocated for research on and development of drugs and vaccines to counter bioterror agents.1 This year, the BioShield Act (P.L. 108-276) was passed, with one of its major purposes being to provoke the development of the medical countermeasures (i.e., therapeutic drugs, vaccines, and diagnostic tests) necessary to cope with bioattacks that might befall the nation in the future.

As significant as these steps are, a number of biodefense analysts and leaders from academia, government, and the pharmaceutical and biotech industries have concluded publicly and privately that the measures the U.S. government has taken to date, including the passage of the BioShield legislation, will not be enough to entice pharmaceutical industry leaders into this field and will not produce the countermeasures the nation needs for a truly effective biodefense.

 

 

Our Mission

To protect people’s health from epidemics and disasters and ensure that communities are resilient to major challenges.