Skip Navigation
Explore our COVID-19 Resources and Updates
CHS blue logo square
 
 
Home > Our Work > All Publications > 2021

Publications

Our publications keep professionals working across the public, private, and academic sectors informed on the most important developments and issues in health security and biosecurity.

Find an article or report by keywords:

 
 
Find an article or report or see all by area, author, or year:

Title:

Why Social Distance Demands Social Justice: Systemic Racism, COVID-19, and Health Security in the United States

Authors:
Sanjana J. Ravi, Kelsey Lane Warmbrod, Allison Barlow, Javier Cepeda, Oluwaseun O. Falade-Nwulia, Emily E. Haroz, Tanjala S. Purnell
Date posted:
June 21, 2021
Publication type:
Article
Publication:
Health Secur. 2021 June
Publisher:
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
DOI:
10.1089/hs.2021.0103
See also:
Introduction:

The trajectories of infectious disease and racial injustice in the United States have been inextricably entwined for centuries. Smallpox, for example, is thought to have arrived with Europeans to the Americas in the 16th century bringing devastating effects to Indigenous populations.1 By the 17th century, numerous reports detail efforts by colonists to deliberately infect Native Americans, becoming one of the earliest documented histories of intentional biological warfare. Further links between infectious disease and racial injustice can be traced to the 1721 smallpox epidemic that ravaged Boston. During this time, the Puritan minister Cotton Mather advocated widely for inoculation, a procedure wherein dried pus from a smallpox patient was scraped into a healthy person's skin to build immunity.2 Mather had learned of inoculation from an enslaved man named Onesimus, who brought knowledge of the practice from Africa. After Zabdiel Boylston, a local physician, successfully tested the procedure on his own son and 2 enslaved household members, he and Mather launched a public inoculation campaign. However, they encountered pushback from White Bostonians, some of whom questioned the validity of African medical practices and speculated that inoculation was a ploy to kill slaveowners. Another physician, William Douglas, went so far as to satirically advocate for using inoculation as a weapon against Native Americans, proposing cash rewards for each death.2,3 Ultimately, though, only 1% to 2% of inoculation recipients died of smallpox during the outbreak, compared to 15% of Bostonians who were infected naturally.3

Over a century later in 1865, amid the aftermath of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln petitioned Congress to establish the Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands—more commonly known as the Freedmen's Bureau—to provide formerly enslaved persons with food, shelter, education, healthcare, and employment. During its 7-year tenure, the Bureau responded to a years-long smallpox epidemic that emerged in Washington, DC, and raged across the country, abetted by unsanitary wartime conditions, close cohabitation, and mass postwar migration across the South.4 A major public health consequence of this effort was the perpetuation of medical bias and racial disparities in smallpox transmission. In the Carolinas alone, some 30,000 freedpeople died of smallpox over a 6-month period, while hundreds more Black and Native Americans across the South and West were infected each month.4 Bureau leaders and federal officials inflicted considerable harm through their response to the crisis, promoting the falsehood that smallpox was a consequence of emancipation, intentionally underreporting cases among White patients to bolster this claim, and neglecting or altogether shuttering hospitals serving freedpeople.

 

 

Our Mission

To protect people’s health from epidemics and disasters and ensure that communities are resilient to major challenges.